Yesterday provided an opportunity to visit some soybean fields and check on growth stages and soybean aphid. The four fields I stopped at were all finished flowering and were in the R6 stage of growth. This is the full seed stage and where on pod on the 4 upper nodes has a seed filling the cavity. Soybean aphid counts were still less than 20 per plant but most all plants had aphids on them. It seems that we are getting to the point that soybean aphid will not be a problem for us in 2009.
Once we get into the R6 stage the plants can tolerate soybean aphid with less effect on yield. The last CORN Newsletter had an article which describe thoughts on higher level thresholds for soybean aphids in bean at these later stages.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Friday, August 14, 2009
The August crop report from USDA gives us the first glimpse of yield estimates for the 2009 crop. If yields for Ohio hold true given the number of acres and estimated yield of 165 bushels per acre Ohio is looking at it largest corn crop ever. The big difference over 2009 from 2008 is the weather with more wide spread and timely rains even with a later planted crop. Soybeans will be 11 bushels higher for the state than in 2008. Below is a snap shot of information on average yield from the report.
This does change the inputs for those who look at the ACRE program. Trend line yield for Ohio corn were 154 and soybean 44. Given the August 2009 yield estimates of the 2009 crop, it will take corn prices on a cash basis (US Marketing Year) of less than $3.40 per bushel and soybean prices of less than $8.95 to generate revenues less than the state guarantee. With good yield and good prices we can certainly live without an ACRE payment but these numbers give some idea of the prices that would trigger payment s for the state of Ohio given the current 2009 production estimates.
The Ohio only report can be found at NASS-Ohio if you would like to see the total US picture that can be found at NASS.
2009 Yield | 2008 Yield | |||
Crop | Ohio | US | Ohio | US |
Corn | 165 | 159.5 | 135 | 153.9 |
Soybeans | 47 | 41.7 | 36 | 39.6 |
Wheat | 71 | 47.2 | 68 | 44.2 |
This does change the inputs for those who look at the ACRE program. Trend line yield for Ohio corn were 154 and soybean 44. Given the August 2009 yield estimates of the 2009 crop, it will take corn prices on a cash basis (US Marketing Year) of less than $3.40 per bushel and soybean prices of less than $8.95 to generate revenues less than the state guarantee. With good yield and good prices we can certainly live without an ACRE payment but these numbers give some idea of the prices that would trigger payment s for the state of Ohio given the current 2009 production estimates.
The Ohio only report can be found at NASS-Ohio if you would like to see the total US picture that can be found at NASS.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Crop Growth Stages are Behind 2008
During my travels this week, I got a good chance to observe crop growth stages. In 2008, this first week of August was also an observation point, so a comparison can be made between 2008 & 2009 growth stages for both soybeans (Table 1) and corn(Table 3) . The majority of the soybean crop is in the R3 stage which is beginning pod. Most of the corn crop is R1-R2 which is silking to blister.
You can see the GDD accumulation chart matches (Table 4) the expected growth stages for corn based off GDD accumulations. So as we progress through the season we can watch the GDD accumulation and predict corn development. Table 5 shows accumulation at OARDC NW Agricultural Research Station from April 1 and May 15 to August 4. We seem to be about 10 days to 2 weeks behind the 2008 growing season in crop development.
You can see the GDD accumulation chart matches (Table 4) the expected growth stages for corn based off GDD accumulations. So as we progress through the season we can watch the GDD accumulation and predict corn development. Table 5 shows accumulation at OARDC NW Agricultural Research Station from April 1 and May 15 to August 4. We seem to be about 10 days to 2 weeks behind the 2008 growing season in crop development.
Year | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 |
2009 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
2008 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 15 | 10 |
Stage | Description | |
R1 | Beginning Bloom | One open flower at any node on the main stem. |
R2 | Full bloom | Open flower at one of the two uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf. |
R3 | Beginning Pod | Pod 3/16 inch (5 mm) long at one of four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf. |
R4 | Full pod | Pod 3/4 inch (2 cm) long at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf |
R5 | Beginning Seed | Seed 1/8 inch (3 mm) long in a pod at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf. |
R6 | Full seed | Pod containing a green seed that fills the pod cavity at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully developed leaf. |
R7 | Beginning Maturity | One normal pod on the main stem that has reached its mature pod color. |
R8 | Full Maturity | Ninety-five percent of the pods that have reached their mature pod color. Five to 10 days away from 15% moisture. |
Year | RT | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 |
2009 | 1 | 21 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
2008 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 7 | 1 |
Growth Stage | Description | Approx. GDDs | Cum.GDDs | Typical Calendar Date |
VT | Tassel | 60 | 1300 | Jul 13 |
R1 | Silking | 60 | 1360 | Jul 15 |
R2 | Blister | 300 | 1660 | Jul 27 |
R3 | Milk | 200 | 1860 | Aug 5 |
R4 | Dough | 140 | 2000 | Aug 11 |
R5 | Dent | 300 | 2300 | Aug 25 |
1/2 Milkline | 220 | 2520 | Sep 5 | |
R6 | Black Layer | 200 | 2720 | Sep 17 |
Time Period | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
April 1-August 4 | 1921 | 1939 | 1968 |
May 15-August 4 | 1646 | 1691 | 1709 |
Soybean Aphids Increasing but Not So Fast
Monday and Tuesday afternoon were spent looking at soybean and corn fields along the route I have setup along County Road's B & L. Soybean aphids were an observation to be made in all soybean fields. Basically I do this not to scout a field for threshold information, but get out in the field away from the end rows and look for the presence of aphids.
The route this year has 52 soybean fields. On the 8/3 and 8/4 scouting, 26 fields had aphids and 26 did not have aphids. If you remember back to my last report on aphids on July 17th only 2 of the 52 fields had aphids in them. So aphids are now easier to find. I would not be surprised if you spent time in a field until you found aphids, that you would be able to find aphids in nearly every field.
From my stops the past couple of days though, we still are not close to threshold of 250 aphids per plant. I went to one of the fields that had aphids back on July 17th and population were just 3-4 per plant and only 30% of the plants had aphids on them which was not different than most other fields. Most fields had 3-6 plants out of 20 with aphids on them or 15-30% of the plants. Numbers of aphids per plant were less than 10. As always there was a field that did not fit the mold and had 18 out of 20 plants or 90% of the plants with aphids, but the average was just 15 per plant . This is a field I will go back to over the next couple of weeks.
From a growth stage standpoint, most soybeans are in the R3 growth stage where there is one 3/4 inch long pod at one of the 4 top nodes on the plant.
The route this year has 52 soybean fields. On the 8/3 and 8/4 scouting, 26 fields had aphids and 26 did not have aphids. If you remember back to my last report on aphids on July 17th only 2 of the 52 fields had aphids in them. So aphids are now easier to find. I would not be surprised if you spent time in a field until you found aphids, that you would be able to find aphids in nearly every field.
From my stops the past couple of days though, we still are not close to threshold of 250 aphids per plant. I went to one of the fields that had aphids back on July 17th and population were just 3-4 per plant and only 30% of the plants had aphids on them which was not different than most other fields. Most fields had 3-6 plants out of 20 with aphids on them or 15-30% of the plants. Numbers of aphids per plant were less than 10. As always there was a field that did not fit the mold and had 18 out of 20 plants or 90% of the plants with aphids, but the average was just 15 per plant . This is a field I will go back to over the next couple of weeks.
From a growth stage standpoint, most soybeans are in the R3 growth stage where there is one 3/4 inch long pod at one of the 4 top nodes on the plant.
Monday, August 3, 2009
Western Bean Cutworm in NW Ohio
Since 2007 Ohio State University Extension has been monitoring the progression of Western Bean Cutworm moths as they move from the mid corn belt areas to the east. The first moth catch was in 2007 for Fulton County and the state. In 2008 we caught 13 moths in Fulton County and 105 in Northwestern Ohio. As of August 3rd we have caught 37 moths in Fulton County and 212 in the Northwest Ohio.
Western Bean Cutworm is an economic pest on corn in western states feeding on the ear and more specifically the grain on the developing and mature ear. This pest has a greater capacity to feed than our traditional corn earworm because multiple larvae survive in the case of Western Bean Cutworm versus one larvae per ear with corn earworm. A full description of WBC can be found in this fact sheet from Wisconsin.
We should not expect economic problems from this pest in 2009 but might see evidence of feeding which would be a first time for Ohio. The feeding of larvae on the ear is the most identifiable stage. If you are out in corn this year, whether it is sweet corn, popcorn or field corn and see holes through the husk and multiple worms feeding on the ear please call the extension office 419-337-9210 or send an e-mail to labarge.1@osu.edu. We want to confirm this activity so we can modify recommendations and future monitoring programs.
Dr Ron Hammond has produced a video on identification of injury from Western Bean Cutworm based on a visit to Michigan to observe the injury in 2008.
Pictures in this article are from a University of Nebraska posting on the web.
Western Bean Cutworm is an economic pest on corn in western states feeding on the ear and more specifically the grain on the developing and mature ear. This pest has a greater capacity to feed than our traditional corn earworm because multiple larvae survive in the case of Western Bean Cutworm versus one larvae per ear with corn earworm. A full description of WBC can be found in this fact sheet from Wisconsin.
We should not expect economic problems from this pest in 2009 but might see evidence of feeding which would be a first time for Ohio. The feeding of larvae on the ear is the most identifiable stage. If you are out in corn this year, whether it is sweet corn, popcorn or field corn and see holes through the husk and multiple worms feeding on the ear please call the extension office 419-337-9210 or send an e-mail to labarge.1@osu.edu. We want to confirm this activity so we can modify recommendations and future monitoring programs.
Dr Ron Hammond has produced a video on identification of injury from Western Bean Cutworm based on a visit to Michigan to observe the injury in 2008.
Pictures in this article are from a University of Nebraska posting on the web.
Wheat Performance Trials Now On-line
The 2009 Ohio Wheat Performance Trials are now available on-line. Sixty soft red winter wheat varieties were included in the trials. A summary of yields and summary of the closest site located in Wood County are below.
Full result of the 2009 Trials which can be sorted by different characteristics can be found on the Performance Trial Website. The site also has resistance rating of Ohio common diseases for varieties included in the test as rated by Ohio State University Plant Pathology staff.
Location | High Yield | Average Yield | Low Yield |
Wood | 93.7 | 85.3 | 76.9 |
Crawford | 113.6 | 106.1 | 98.1 |
Darke | 101.9 | 88.8 | 87.1 |
Wayne | 107.7 | 95.7 | 83.9 |
Yield | Test Wt. | Lodging | Powdery Mildew | Head Scab | |
High | 93.7 | 63.9 | 19 | 10 | 23.4 |
Average | 85.3 | 61.1 | 2 | 6.4 | 12.6 |
Low | 76.9 | 58.9 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.8 |
Full result of the 2009 Trials which can be sorted by different characteristics can be found on the Performance Trial Website. The site also has resistance rating of Ohio common diseases for varieties included in the test as rated by Ohio State University Plant Pathology staff.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)